AI interviews, not a human-services project
Candorings runs the buyer interviews itself, so you can cover every closed deal at software cost — not a few dozen interviews a year at consulting rates.
A cheap survey buyers half-answer vs a conversation they’ll actually open up in.
Plenty of teams run win-loss themselves with a general survey tool — a Typeform or SurveyMonkey questionnaire emailed to lost prospects, often filled in by the rep or skipped by the buyer.
Candorings runs the buyer interviews itself, so you can cover every closed deal at software cost — not a few dozen interviews a year at consulting rates.
Connect your CRM and every closed-won, closed-lost, and churned deal triggers an interview automatically. The readout is a living view, not a point-in-time study.
Buyers answer a neutral AI in their own words, with adaptive follow-ups — so you get the real reason, not the rep’s after-the-fact attribution or a 1–5 survey score.
Why you win, lose, and churn — cut by outcome, competitor, and segment, including what winners say that losers don’t — then drafted actions across pricing, sales, product, and retention, each traced to evidence.
Buyers stay candid the same way throughout: individual responses are never shown to your team, and any segment too small to protect a person is suppressed or merged by a minimum-N gate.
If you just need a couple of structured data points and have the discipline to chase responses, a DIY survey is the cheapest possible start. Candorings exists because the survey is where win-loss usually dies: low response, no depth, and no neutral party — so you get a score, not the reason.